Skip to content

Hirono, Warren, Durbin Lead Colleagues in Pressing Deputy Attorney General Blanche on Conflicts of Interest Following Decision to Ease Prosecution of Cryptocurrency-Related Crimes

Senators: “At the very least, you had a glaring conflict of interest and should have recused yourself.”

~ Letter follows ProPublica investigation into Deputy AG Blanche’s crypto holdings ~

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Dick Durbin (D-IL) led three of their colleagues in a letter to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, pressing him on his decision last year to disband the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET) and terminate investigations and prosecutions into the tools used to facilitate cryptocurrency crime, in light of recent reporting that he held more than $150,000 in cryptocurrency at the time of the decision.

The letter follows a recent investigation into Blanche after reports that he broke federal conflict-of-interest law when he ordered changes to crypto prosecutions that would benefit the industry, while owning at least $158,000 in cryptocurrency. Last year, Senators Hirono, Warren, and Durbin led a letter to Blanche following these changes, urging him to reverse his decision.

“Last year, we asked for the rationale behind your puzzling decision to scale back the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) cryptocurrency enforcement efforts and urged you to reconsider. We write now in light of recent reporting that you held substantial amounts of cryptocurrency at the time you made this decision,” wrote the senators. “At the very least, you had a glaring conflict of interest and should have recused yourself.”

The senators emphasize that in their previous letter, they had warned that disbanding the NCET and taking a hands-off approach to the tools that criminals use to obscure their uses of cryptocurrency would support further criminal activity such as sanctions evasion, drug trafficking, scams, and child sexual exploitation.

“Unfortunately, our predictions have proven correct, with illicit cryptocurrency activity soaring 162% in 2025,” continued the senators. “This increase was driven primarily by a dramatic rise in the receipt of cryptocurrency by sanctioned entities, but most categories of crypto crime saw increases, including human trafficking and other violent crime. Moreover, Chinese money laundering networks—to which the Trump Administration has drawn attention for moving billions for Mexican drug cartels—have now emerged as a ‘dominant force’ in the digital asset ecosystem.”

The senators write that President Trump and his family’s interest in selling their cryptocurrency, as well as Blanche’s own crypto holdings, called into question the motivation behind Blanche’s decision to ease law enforcement scrutiny of cryptocurrency-related crimes last year.

“But the fact that you held substantial amounts of cryptocurrency at the time you made this decision calls into question your own motivations,” concluded the senators.

The senators seek Blanche’s communications and documentation regarding the handling of his cryptocurrency holdings and related conflicts of interest prior to and at the time of his decision to scale back DOJ’s cryptocurrency enforcement efforts, by no later than February 11, 2026.

In addition to Senators Hirono, Warren, and Durbin, the letter is also signed by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Chris Coons (D-DE), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).

The full text of the letter is available here and below.

Dear Deputy Attorney General Blanche:

Last year, we asked for the rationale behind your puzzling decision to scale back the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) cryptocurrency enforcement efforts and urged you to reconsider. We write now in light of recent reporting that you held substantial amounts of cryptocurrency at the time you made this decision. Your actions may be a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 208(a). At the very least, you had a glaring conflict of interest and should have recused yourself.

We warned in our prior letter that disbanding the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team and taking a hands-off approach to the exchanges, mixers, and other tools that criminals use to obscure the sources and uses of their cryptocurrency were “grave mistakes that will support sanctions evasion, drug trafficking, scams, and child sexual exploitation.” DOJ’s perfunctory response to our letter promised that prosecutors would target criminals using cryptocurrency in furtherance of their crimes. Unfortunately, our predictions have proven correct, with illicit cryptocurrency activity soaring 162% in 2025. This increase was driven primarily by a dramatic rise in the receipt of cryptocurrency by sanctioned entities, but most categories of crypto crime saw increases, including human trafficking and other violent crime. Moreover, Chinese money laundering networks—to which the Trump Administration has drawn attention for moving billions for Mexican drug cartels—have now emerged as a “dominant force” in the digital asset ecosystem.

We noted that “[y]our decisions give rise to concerns that President Trump’s interest in selling his cryptocurrency may be the reason for easing law enforcement scrutiny.” Certainly, President Trump’s financial interests seem to have motivated some of his pardons of criminals convicted of cryptocurrency-related crimes. But the fact that you held substantial amounts of cryptocurrency at the time you made this decision calls into question your own motivations. The timeline of events is clear:

  • 1/18/25: You disclosed cryptocurrency holdings of between $158,000 and $470,000, mostly in Bitcoin and Ethereum.
  • 2/10/25: You agreed to divest these assets “as soon as practicable.”
  • 3/5/25: You were confirmed as Deputy Attorney General.
  • 4/7/25: You issued a memo scaling back DOJ’s cryptocurrency enforcement.
  • 5/31/25–6/3/25: Your cryptocurrency holdings were sold or transferred to relatives.

As noted above, your decision to direct this change in DOJ policy favorable to the cryptocurrency industry while holding substantial amounts of cryptocurrency appears to have violated 18 U.S.C. § 208(a). This provision generally prohibits an executive branch employee from “participat[ing] personally and substantially” in a “decision . . . or other particular matter in which, to his knowledge, he . . . has a financial interest.” Willful violations of this provision are punishable by up to five years in prison. Your conduct is now the subject of a complaint to DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General.

We have a constitutional obligation to perform oversight over the Department of Justice and its personnel and policy decisions. To that end, please preserve all relevant documents and communications, answer the following questions, and provide the requested information:

  1. In a statement issued on January 23, 2026, DOJ represented on your behalf that “this was appropriately flagged, addressed, and cleared in advance.” Please describe in detail the facts underlying that statement. At a minimum, please explain:
    1. What was “appropriately flagged”?
    2. To whom was “this . . . appropriately flagged”?
    3. By whom was “this . . . appropriately flagged”?
    4. How was “this . . . addressed”?
    5. How was “this . . . cleared”?
    6. By whom was “this . . . cleared”?
  2. Did you receive a written determination pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) in advance of issuing your April 7, 2025 memorandum regarding cryptocurrency enforcement? If so, please provide a copy.
  3. Did you communicate with agency ethics officials or anyone else within DOJ or the federal government about the propriety of issuing your April 7, 2025 memorandum regarding cryptocurrency enforcement while holding substantial cryptocurrency assets? If so, please provide all records reflecting or relating to this communication.
  4. Did you communicate with representatives of any companies active in the cryptocurrency industry between March 5, 2025 and April 7, 2025? If so, please provide all records reflecting or relating to this communication.
  5. Why did you wait until May 31, 2025 to begin disposing of your cryptocurrency holdings when you had promised to do so “as soon as practicable” more than three months earlier?
  6. Why did you fail to recuse yourself from the decision to issue the April 7, 2025 memo regarding cryptocurrency enforcement?

Proper enforcement of our nation’s laws against criminals using cryptocurrency is of vital importance. To that end, we request answers to these questions and production of the requested materials as soon as possible and no later than February 11, 2026.

Sincerely,

###